{"id":13416,"date":"2025-04-24T16:23:18","date_gmt":"2025-04-24T16:23:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.yiaho.com\/le-point-magazine-to-cut-58-jobs-some-replaced-by-ai\/"},"modified":"2025-04-24T16:23:18","modified_gmt":"2025-04-24T16:23:18","slug":"le-point-magazine-to-cut-58-jobs-some-replaced-by-ai","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.yiaho.com\/en\/le-point-magazine-to-cut-58-jobs-some-replaced-by-ai\/","title":{"rendered":"Le Point magazine to cut 58 jobs… some replaced by AI!"},"content":{"rendered":"

The French weekly magazine Le Point, owned by businessman Fran\u00e7ois Pinault, has announced a major restructuring plan, involving the elimination of 58 positions, some of which will be replaced by artificial intelligence tools.<\/p>\n

This decision, confirmed by Agence France-Presse (AFP) and the media outlet La Lettre, comes in a context of declining sales and increased competition from digital media. The trend is intensifying, as a few weeks ago, the newspaper The New York Times also integrated AI into its newsroom<\/a>. <\/p>\n

Is this the beginning of the end for journalism and other media professions?<\/p>\n

Le Point: Jobs replaced by artificial intelligence<\/h2>\n

The proposed employment safeguard plan affects 32 permanent employees and 26 freelancers. The proofreading and editing departments, employing about fifteen people, are particularly targeted. These tasks, often considered repetitive, will now be partially handled by AI tools, but always under human supervision. <\/p>\n

Five editorial positions are also affected, although the company assures that AI will not write articles. <\/strong>At the same time, Le Point is considering creating 18 new positions, focused on areas such as investigative reporting.<\/p>\n

Read also on this topic: Will AI replace accountants? The truth about the future of the profession<\/a><\/p>\n

Why cut jobs in favor of AI?<\/h2>\n

Management justifies these choices by a desire to “upgrade quality,” aiming to stand out in a media landscape dominated by the race for digital news.<\/p>\n

Context: a press sector in crisis<\/h3>\n

Le Point is facing the economic pressures affecting the entire print media industry. The transition to digital, while strategic, comes with fierce competition from online media and free information platforms. This context is pushing many publications to reduce costs while investing in innovative technologies. <\/p>\n

The integration of AI into editorial processes, such as proofreading or editing, is a growing trend in media.<\/strong> Tools like our online spell checker<\/a> or proprietary algorithms allow for the automation of time-consuming tasks, reducing staffing needs.<\/p>\n

Le Point emphasizes a “reasonable and supervised use” of these technologies, excluding for now their use in writing articles.<\/p>\n

Will AI replace employees? An accelerating trend <\/h2>\n

The example of Le Point illustrates a broader trend: media integration of AI to reduce costs and adapt to digital transformation. A McKinsey study (March 2024) reveals that approximately 30% of working hours in Europe could be automated by 2030 through generative AI, particularly in administrative and editorial fields. <\/p>\n

This evolution therefore raises ethical and social questions. The reduction of certain positions, even if offset by other job creations, could make qualified professionals more vulnerable, and automation risks standardizing certain aspects of journalistic work. <\/p>\n

See also on this topic: Here are the jobs that will never be replaced by artificial intelligence<\/a><\/p>\n

Proofreaders, translators, writers… are these professions in danger?<\/h2>\n

This reorganization, driven by economic imperatives and a desire for modernization, highlights the disruptions that AI is imposing on the media sector. Beyond proofreaders, many professions will inevitably be affected. <\/p>\n

To optimize costs, improve processes and make them faster, it is legitimate to wonder what future awaits translators, news brief writers and even journalists themselves.<\/p>\n

Who can guarantee that they are not already using AI to rephrase, correct their errors or improve their texts?<\/p>\n

Moreover, advances in generative AI for images or videos raise questions about the future of graphic designers, video editors and sound engineers. In ten years, if AI becomes a hundred times more powerful than today, the impact could be profoundly disruptive for many sectors! <\/p>\n

Sources:<\/strong><\/p>\n